1-1 -100.
"1-1 is just the tip of the iceberg... I routinely go on 10 to 12 game winning streaks."
"1-1 is just the tip of the iceberg... I routinely go on 10 to 12 game winning streaks."
- Status
Oakland Raiders Moneyline -140
Full Disclosure
NFL 2017 (6-1 +4.20)
Seattle -260 11.9.17 W +1.00
AZ +9 12.31.17 W +1.00
Buffalo +9 1.7.18 W +1.00
Vikings -250 1.14.18 W +1.00
Jags +9 1.24.18 W +1.00
Pro Bowl U 77.5+1.28.18 W +1.00
Pats -180 2.4.18 L -1.80
NFL 2018 (1-1 -0.10)
AZ -1 9.9.18 L -1.1
Pitt E 9.24.18 W +1.00
Oak -1.40 9.30.18
Overall 7-2 +4.1 78%
Big lou can only dream of hitting at this rate
NFL 2017 (6-1 +4.20)
Seattle -260 11.9.17 W +1.00
AZ +9 12.31.17 W +1.00
Buffalo +9 1.7.18 W +1.00
Vikings -250 1.14.18 W +1.00
Jags +9 1.24.18 W +1.00
Pro Bowl U 77.5+1.28.18 W +1.00
Pats -180 2.4.18 L -1.80
NFL 2018 (1-1 -0.10)
AZ -1 9.9.18 L -1.1
Pitt E 9.24.18 W +1.00
Oak -1.40 9.30.18
Overall 7-2 +4.1 78%
Big lou can only dream of hitting at this rate
NFL 2018 (1-1 -0.10)
AZ -1 9.9.18 L -1.1
Pitt E 9.24.18 W +1.00
Oak -1.40 9.30.18 pending
AZ -1 9.9.18 L -1.1
Pitt E 9.24.18 W +1.00
Oak -1.40 9.30.18 pending
No shit I feel the same way about all the childish arguments and egos here these days. Not like in days past when we knew the face behind a name and a reputation ment something. To many people said stupid shit or got crushed and just started over with another username. Now we have all turned into a bunch of fighting bitches. Bunch of Internet tough guys. Sad I miss the good ole days when it was about sports and beating the books not each other.
Lighten up Francis. It's the rubber room!
He says he routinely goes on 10-12 game winning streaks. If he does, it will all be posted here. Lighten up and have some fun!
Honestly siege has toned it down some. He is a spot bettor posting 1 maybe 2 plays a week if that. I will admit since last season he has posted maybe 12 games or so and has a winning record. He just demands respect sometimes but dosent really get it. Really siege aint really the problem its his fan boys that try to stir most of it up. Go Raiders
Its hard to get respect when you post ML chalk plays
-140
-180
-210
-240
-280
My grandmother would also have a winning record
-140
-180
-210
-240
-280
My grandmother would also have a winning record
Obviously it is almost impossible to tell if someone wins when they bet so little volume unless they are spending like 300 words breaking down their analysis of the game but for the most part betting 1-2 plays a week is the right way to do it.
There are 14-16 games a week, oddsmakers aren't making mistakes on 30% of the lines. Granted if you can get down on stuff early in the week you can find more good spots, but come Sat/Sun most of those lines pretty tight. So being selective makes sense.
That's why I don't really like Westgate contest, just tough to find value on 5 games a week so everyone regresses towards the mean.
There was a thread in OS earlier this year where I told BAS I'd let him pick anyone ahead of time and I'll take under 58% on them. He just has to pick the person in advance.
Now that this has popped into my head, gonna check how the person is doing. CHA Ballers was the person he said he'd pick but he didn't end up betting it.
- Status
